Hi Rajendra, Todd, On Fri, 10 Jun 2011, Rajendra Nayak wrote: > Paul/Benoit any thoughts on if a per-clkdm lock seems reasonable? Sounds okay to me. The experimental patch that you sent didn't add the locking to the *wkdep, *sleepdep functions; I guess we'd better add it there at the same time, since some of the register access there does a read-modify-write. It should be possible to get rid of the atomic_t usage in the clockdomain code as part of the same series. Todd, thanks for pointing this out. - Paul -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
