Hello, On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 02:13:59PM +0300, Péter Ujfalusi wrote: > On Wednesday 15 June 2011 10:23:01 Tejun Heo wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 10:18:58AM +0200, Tejun Heo wrote: > > > No human being can feel 120usec difference and I can't see how using > > > HIGHPRI is justified here (which is what the code is doing > > > _accidentally_ by using singlethread_workqueue). > > > > Ooh, one more thing, and even if you insist on using HIGHPRI (please > > don't), you don't need to create workqueue for each device. You can > > just create one for the whole driver in init and destroy it from exit. > > What matters is the HIGHPRI attribute of the workqueue. The number of > > workqueues is completely irrelevant. > > Fair enough. > I'll move to create_workqueue. I suppose you meant alloc_workqueue()? :) Sorry about the confusing names, I'm still in the (slow) process of deprecating older APIs. Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
