On Wednesday 15 June 2011 10:23:01 Tejun Heo wrote: > On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 10:18:58AM +0200, Tejun Heo wrote: > > No human being can feel 120usec difference and I can't see how using > > HIGHPRI is justified here (which is what the code is doing > > _accidentally_ by using singlethread_workqueue). > > Ooh, one more thing, and even if you insist on using HIGHPRI (please > don't), you don't need to create workqueue for each device. You can > just create one for the whole driver in init and destroy it from exit. > What matters is the HIGHPRI attribute of the workqueue. The number of > workqueues is completely irrelevant. Fair enough. I'll move to create_workqueue. If we later find issues with this (in a 'live' system), we can figure out a way to fix it. Thank you for your time on this. I'll make the changes accordingly. Regards, Péter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
