On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 22:24, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 06/10/2011 03:19 PM, Menon, Nishanth wrote: >> On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 01:42, Santosh Shilimkar >> <santosh.shilimkar@xxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> It's a well known problem if the udelay() is based of global lpj. >>> You can read more here [1] >>> >>> Regards >>> Santosh >>> [1] http://eeek.borgchat.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg120702.html >> I am curious about this topic now. >> Searching Russel's patchworks for this: >> http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/search.php?summary=udelay >> I see nothing queued. What is the recommendation for udelay? > > The patches are sitting in Russell's patch tracker, waiting for him to > accept/reject them. > > http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/viewpatch.php?id=6874/1 > http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/viewpatch.php?id=6875/1 > http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/viewpatch.php?id=6873/1 thanks for the same and hope these do get through :) Regards, Nishanth Menon -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
