On 06/10/2011 03:19 PM, Menon, Nishanth wrote: > On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 01:42, Santosh Shilimkar > <santosh.shilimkar@xxxxxx> wrote: >> >> It's a well known problem if the udelay() is based of global lpj. >> You can read more here [1] >> >> Regards >> Santosh >> [1] http://eeek.borgchat.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg120702.html > I am curious about this topic now. > Searching Russel's patchworks for this: > http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/search.php?summary=udelay > I see nothing queued. What is the recommendation for udelay? The patches are sitting in Russell's patch tracker, waiting for him to accept/reject them. http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/viewpatch.php?id=6874/1 http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/viewpatch.php?id=6875/1 http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/viewpatch.php?id=6873/1 -- Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
