* Igor Grinberg <grinberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [110603 06:33]:
>
> I'm not sure I understand what are you trying to propose here...
> If you look once again on the code, there is currently only one if (cpu_is_..) {} else {}
> statement currently present.
> (I can remove the "if (cpu_is_omap3630())" - it indeed has no value)
>
> Indeed, there will be some other differences...
> Each time I submit a patch, I try to be as optimal as I can,
> but again I'm open for suggestions...
> (though I think it is optimal, e.g. 33 lines for a new running board...)
What I meant is that maybe you should do the detection first in some
get_revision function and populate the gpio pins there. Sort of like
this recent beagle patch:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/859662/
That way adding support for other differences will be easier.
Regards,
Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
