* Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx> [110523 11:11]: > On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 10:15:15AM +0300, Jarkko Nikula wrote: > > On Mon, 23 May 2011 09:14:38 +0300 > > Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > a gentle ping here too. Without this we will have regressions on > > > ehci/ohci as the pm_runtime patches have gone in via Samuel. > > > > > Does this mean that those regressions happened already when those > > patches were made if there is pull request dependency? > > not really, no. > > > Remember bisectability is important. And very important if you are > > bisecting something else but which is dependent on this as then you > > could mark wrong good/bad points or not able to determine. > > True, true... I just wanted to avoid conflicts as much as possible so > arch/arm/*omap*/ goes through Tony, and drivers/mfd/* goes through > Samuel. > > pm_rutime and hwmod conversion aren't really that tightly coupled. As > long as the arch code is in place, we can do pm_runtime at any time. Not > sure if it's true the other way around. But one thing is for sure, if > this pull request isn't taken, then I guess clocks won't enable on > omap-usbhs... Looks like these patches are missing acks from Benoit and Paul? I'd rather not pull them in without the acks. Note that we have a very short merge window this time, so let's see if we can still get them in. Regards, Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
