Re: [PATCH 08/22] mmc: omap_hsmmc: correct debug report error status mnemonics

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 5:21 PM, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> CERR and BADA were in the wrong place and there are only
> 32 not 35.
>
> Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c |   19 +++++++++++--------
>  1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c
> index bd52849..a1a1101 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c
> @@ -982,14 +982,14 @@ static void omap_hsmmc_dma_cleanup(struct omap_hsmmc_host *host, int errno)
>  * Readable error output
>  */
>  #ifdef CONFIG_MMC_DEBUG
> -static void omap_hsmmc_report_irq(struct omap_hsmmc_host *host, u32 status)
> +static void omap_hsmmc_dbg_report_irq(struct omap_hsmmc_host *host, u32 status)
>  {
>        /* --- means reserved bit without definition at documentation */
>        static const char *omap_hsmmc_status_bits[] = {
> -               "CC", "TC", "BGE", "---", "BWR", "BRR", "---", "---", "CIRQ",
> -               "OBI", "---", "---", "---", "---", "---", "ERRI", "CTO", "CCRC",
> -               "CEB", "CIE", "DTO", "DCRC", "DEB", "---", "ACE", "---",
> -               "---", "---", "---", "CERR", "CERR", "BADA", "---", "---", "---"
> +               "CC"  , "TC"  , "BGE", "---", "BWR" , "BRR" , "---" , "---" ,
> +               "CIRQ", "OBI" , "---", "---", "---" , "---" , "---" , "ERRI",
> +               "CTO" , "CCRC", "CEB", "CIE", "DTO" , "DCRC", "DEB" , "---" ,
> +               "ACE" , "---" , "---", "---", "CERR", "BADA", "---" , "---"
>        };
>        char res[256];
>        char *buf = res;
> @@ -1006,6 +1006,11 @@ static void omap_hsmmc_report_irq(struct omap_hsmmc_host *host, u32 status)
>
>        dev_dbg(mmc_dev(host->mmc), "%s\n", res);
>  }
> +#else
> +static inline void omap_hsmmc_dbg_report_irq(struct omap_hsmmc_host *host,
> +                                            u32 status)
> +{
> +}
>  #endif  /* CONFIG_MMC_DEBUG */
>
>  /*
> @@ -1064,9 +1069,7 @@ static void omap_hsmmc_do_irq(struct omap_hsmmc_host *host, int status)
>        dev_dbg(mmc_dev(host->mmc), "IRQ Status is %x\n", status);
>
>        if (status & ERR) {
> -#ifdef CONFIG_MMC_DEBUG
> -               omap_hsmmc_report_irq(host, status);
> -#endif
> +               omap_hsmmc_dbg_report_irq(host, status);
>                if ((status & CMD_TIMEOUT) ||
>                        (status & CMD_CRC)) {
>                        if (host->cmd) {
> --
> 1.7.0.4
>
I checked against the TRM and you are right.
FWIW,
 Reviewed-by: Venkatraman S <svenkatr@xxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux