Tony, Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > * jean.pihet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <jean.pihet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [110504 06:32]: >> >> +int omap_pm_set_max_mpu_wakeup_lat(struct device *dev, long t) > ... > >> +int omap_pm_set_max_dev_wakeup_lat(struct device *req_dev, struct device *dev, > ... > >> +int omap_pm_set_min_clk_rate(struct device *dev, struct clk *c, long r) > ... > > You should implement this as a Linux generic framework, we don't > want to add more omap specific frameworks. This series isn't adding any new OMAP-specific frameworks. The OMAP PM layer is already in place, and has been there for awhile. OMAP PM is a layer which can have "plugins" so we can experiment with ways of handling constraints without changing the driver interface, and this series is just implementing a new plugin. Once we are happy with a constraint layer, and can prove it will work, the plan is to get rid of the (existing) OMAP-specific APIs and propose a generic interface. Kevin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
