Re: [v2 0/7] OMAP: GPIO: Use PM runtime framework

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> [110504 00:37]:
> 2011/5/3 Kevin Hilman <khilman@xxxxxx>:
> 
> > Are you OK with a move of the current OMAP GPIO drivers (rather ugly)
> > into drivers/gpio first, followed by the cleanup/restructure patches?
> 
> In my case I actually did some cleanup after moving the driver for
> U300, but I think this is a question to the GPIO maintainer who
> I want to ACK this stuff in the end.
> 
> Grant?
> 
> You can always squash it later ...

Personally I would prefer absolutely minimal clean-up of current
code before moving to drivers/gpio to cut down the "crazy churn" in
arch/arm/. Also then further changes are easier for the GPIO
maintainers to review.

Of course I understand that this might cause extra load for the
GPIO maintainers, so it's up to the GPIO maintainers to set the
required standards before accepting the code into drivers/gpio.

Regards,

Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux