On Thu, 2011-04-28 at 20:30 +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: > On Wed, 2011-04-27 at 17:39 +0530, Saxena, Parth wrote: > > This patch solves the above issue for omap by initialising > > badblockbits. We are working further on this to find a generic fix > > to the problem in nand_base.c. > > But it looks like the generic solution is to return the line which was > accidentally removed, how about this patch > > From: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@xxxxxxxxx> > Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 20:26:59 +0300 > Subject: [PATCH] mtd: return badblockbits back > > In commit c7b28e25cb9beb943aead770ff14551b55fa8c79 the initialization of > the backblockbits was accidentally removed. This patch returns it back, > because otherwise some NAND drivers are broken. > > This problem was reported by "Saxena, Parth <parth.saxena@xxxxxx>" here: > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2011-April/035221.html > > Reported-by: Saxena, Parth <parth.saxena@xxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxx [2.6.36+] > --- > drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c | 2 ++ > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) Any ack/nack/tested-by? -- Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy (ÐÑÑÑÐ ÐÐÑÑÑÐÐÐ) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
