Hi Sakari, On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 8:27 PM, Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Ramirez Luna, Omar wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 10:13 AM, Sakari Ailus >> <sakari.ailus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> This patchset is aimed to fix a problem in arch_iommu implementation >>> references. When an actual arch_iommu implementation is not loaded while >>> iommu_get() is being called results to a kernel oops, as well as >>> removing an arch_iommu implementation which is in use. >> >> How about fixing the dependency instead? Right now iommu2 depends on >> iommu because of the calls to >> install_iommu_arch/uninstall_iommu_arch... we should change that >> dependency to iommu depend on iommu2. Something like iommu (plat) >> querying iommu2 (mach) for devices to install. > > There is no direct dependency from a driver using the generic API to a > particular implementation of the iommu. This comes from the design of > the iommu framework. The generic layer shouldn't depend on particular > implementation(s). > > What comes to the patch, it works as long as there's only one iommu > implementation loaded / compiled to the kernel. I wonder if this kind of > limitation can be accepted. The generic iommu driver cannot support more than one implementation loaded at the same time, so your patch is correct by assuming it. Regards, David Cohen > > Regards, > > -- > Sakari Ailus > sakari.ailus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at Âhttp://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
