Hi Ben & Andy, * Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> [110309 11:09]: > * Cousson, Benoit <b-cousson@xxxxxx> [110309 06:00]: > > Hi Tony, > > > > On 3/9/2011 12:38 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > >* Cousson, Benoit<b-cousson@xxxxxx> [110308 13:34]: > > >>Hi Andy, > > >> > > >>Thanks for that really fast update. That looks pretty good at first > > >>glance. I still have to review in details. > > > > > >Yes nice job! > > > > > >>And we need to find some volunteers for OMAP1& 2 testing. > > > > > >I gave it a quick try on osk5912, seems to work just fine. > > >Will apply these for testing purposes to linux-omap tree while > > >waiting for the minor fixes. > > > > > >Looks like Benoit should take the arch/arm/*omap*/*hwmod* > > >patches, the rest should go throug Ben. So for all of them: > > > > Paul and I already acked the hwmod data, but the whole series should > > maybe go through Ben, because the hwmod files will need some defines > > added in the i2c header file. So we cannot separate the hwmod* > > patches from the driver files patches. > > Unfortunately the hwmod patches depend on omap-for-linus branch.. > > Considering this, it's probably best that I queue the whole series > assuming we get acks from Ben for the driver related changes. After looking at this again, I've changed my mind. It looks like this series can be rebased on v2.6.38-rc8 and should merge just fine with what we have queued in omap-for-linus. I guess I forgot we already did the i2c-omap hwmod conversion last merge window :) Andy, please repost the related patches against v2.6.38-rc8 with the acks posted earlier. Then Ben, please feel free to queue it after you get the rebased series. We've had this series applied for testing for a while. Regards, Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
