Re: [PATCH v8 0/8] omap3: pm: TWL4030 power scripts and workaround for TWL errata 27

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Kevin,

On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 2:55 AM, Kevin Hilman <khilman@xxxxxx> wrote:
> Lesly A M <leslyam@xxxxxx> writes:
>
>> Patch series for TWL4030 power scripts and workaround for TWL errata 27.
>>
>> Changes for implementing TWL4030 power scripts recommended by hardware team.
>> Introduced a new TWL4030 power script file, which can be used by different
>> OMAP3 board with the power companion chip TWL4030.
>>
>> Updated the changes for TWL4030 errata 27 & 28, and modified the
>> TWL4030 power script.
>> Workaround for TWL4030 errata 27 & 28 is required for
>> Si version less than or equal to TWL5030 ES1.1.
>>
>> TWL4030 script changes rebased on Kevin's PM tree in pm branch.
>
> This doesn't apply to the current PM branch.  I dropped the old scripts
> from the PM branch some time back.  It should be a simple rebase, and
> only affects PATCH 6/8.  After the rebase, it will only add the new
> stuff to the 3430SDP board file instead of also delete the old scripts.
>
> Also, minor nit: please consistenly capitlize acronyms: API, OMAP, etc,
> and the singular for errata is erattum.  This affects subjects,
> changelogs comments etc.

Ok, I wil fix it.

>
>> Changes in v7:
>>       changes to fix Nishanth Menon's comments
>>               i) Added the TWL4030 Errata 27 fix
>>
>>       split the first patch in v6
>>               i)  fix for twl4030 script load
>>               ii) correct the warning print during script loading
>>
>>       Added new patch files
>>               i) changing sys_off signal polarity
>>
>> Changes in v8:
>>       updated the change logs
>>       moving the TWL IDCODE checking to twl-core.c
>>
>> Since the voltage layer is evolving to a new design, the voltage dependant
>> changes required for the TRITON script are not incorporated in the patch series.
>> So this TRITON script patch series can be tested with a separate patch for
>> voltage layer changes.
>>
>>       lnk: http://pastebin.mozilla.org/1118306
>
> I'm OK with leaving the voltage layer changes for a separate series, but
> in order to test this should also be rebased against my current PM branch.
>
> For future reference, my pm-core branch includes only patches/series
> that are already queued for upstream, or will be queued for the next
> merge window.

Ok, I will rebase the patches.

Thanks & Regards,
Lesly A M
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux