* Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@xxxxxx> [110221 11:01]: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Cousson, Benoit [mailto:b-cousson@xxxxxx] > > Sent: Monday, February 21, 2011 11:41 PM > > To: Shilimkar, Santosh > > Cc: linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Balbi, Felipe; R, Sricharan > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] omap4: Initialise the l3 device with the > > hwmod data. > > > > On 2/21/2011 2:46 PM, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote: > > > From: sricharan<r.sricharan@xxxxxx> > > > > > > The l3 interconnect device is build with all the data required > > > to handle the error logging. The data is extracted from the > > > hwmod data base. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: sricharan<r.sricharan@xxxxxx> > > > Signed-off-by: sricharan<r.sricharan@xxxxxx> > > > Tested-by: sricharan<r.sricharan@xxxxxx> > > > > Mmm, I'm not sure the tested-by is meaningfull in your case, since > > you wrote the code and so everybody will assume you tested it. > > One s-o-b should be probably enough. > > > > Well he tested whole series including the patch from Felipe. > So a tested-by on whole series doesn't hurt, right ? > > Just for record, I have seen tested by applied on whole series > Where as some of the patches in this series are just comment > updates. Well Signed-off-by also means Tested-by. If not, it should be specifically mentioned when the patch is posted. Something like "PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS PATCH IS COMPLETELY UNTESTED". Also one Signed-off-by is enough like Benoit pointed out :) Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
