On Mon, 2011-02-28 at 08:47 -0600, Jarkko Nikula wrote: > On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 13:26:44 -0800 > Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > We should avoid selecting driver related things, otherwise we can never > > build a tiny kernel with initramfs with everything as modules. > > > > Can you see if adding depends to the LCD panel option does the trick > > instead? > > > True and as lcd_2430sdp.c is not compiled without CONFIG_FB_OMAP a hack > below should work a bit better. > > What would you think Tomi? > > diff --git a/drivers/video/omap/Kconfig b/drivers/video/omap/Kconfig > index 083c8fe..c981249 100644 > --- a/drivers/video/omap/Kconfig > +++ b/drivers/video/omap/Kconfig > @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ config FB_OMAP > select FB_CFB_FILLRECT > select FB_CFB_COPYAREA > select FB_CFB_IMAGEBLIT > + select TWL4030_CORE if MACH_OMAP_2430SDP > help > Frame buffer driver for OMAP based boards. > Well, it's a bit ugly, but I'm fine with it. It's for the old omapfb, which hopefully nobody uses anymore (right =), and there's no simple way to make it modular and neat. The old omapfb compiles lcd_2430sdp always into the kernel if MACH_OMAP_2430SDP is defined, so this looks like a correct fix to me. Heh, interestingly, the old omapfb Makefile says: "Makefile for the new OMAP framebuffer device driver". Things are relative =). Tomi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html