On Mon, 2011-02-28 at 02:16 -0600, Semwal, Sumit wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 12:57 PM, archit taneja <archit@xxxxxx> wrote: <snip> > > Yes, it might get misleading if someone looking at the code tries to find > > "core" in the TRM, I guess we should stick to "omapdss_dss", this also > > ensures a uniform matching of the platform driver names and the beginning of > > register names for each HW module. > > Hmmm... I guess omapdss_dss seems a better name in this view; I'm ok > with this way of naming - do you want me to send a patch for it, or > would you update this patch itself? I've made the change. I changed the commits in my tree according to this new naming. Quite a bit of changes, so I removed tested-bys from the patches. I'll do some more testing, and push the changes to my master branch. Tomi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
