On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 5:54 PM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, 2011-02-21 at 16:38 +0200, David Cohen wrote: >> Currently sched.h and wait.h have circular dependency between both. >> wait.h defines macros wake_up*() which use macros TASK_* defined by >> sched.h. But as sched.h indirectly includes wait.h, such wait.h header >> file can't include sched.h too. The side effect is when some file >> includes wait.h and tries to use its wake_up*() macros, it's necessary >> to include sched.h also. >> This patch moves all TASK_* macros from linux/sched.h to a new header >> file linux/task_state.h. This way, both sched.h and wait.h can include >> task_state.h and fix the circular dependency. No need to include sched.h >> anymore when wake_up*() macros are used. > > I think Alexey already told you what you done wrong. > > Also, I really don't like the task_state.h header, it assumes a lot of > things it doesn't include itself and only works because its using macros > and not inlines at it probably should. Like wait.h I'd say. The main issue is wait.h uses TASK_* macros but cannot properly include sched.h as it would create a circular dependency. So a file including wait.h is able to compile because the dependency of sched.h relies on wake_up*() macros and it's not always used. We can still drop everything else from task_state.h but the TASK_* macros and then the problem you just pointed out won't exist anymore. What do you think about it? Br, David > > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
