Hi, I'll send patch series in a short while. -Kishon On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Jarkko Nikula <jhnikula@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, 17 Feb 2011 15:41:40 -0800 > Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > > Actually this part of code doesn't compile for CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP2 if >> > > CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP3 is not set. Reason is that the buffer_size in under >> > > CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP3 compilation in struct omap_mcbsp_platform_data >> > > definition. >> > > >> > > I think it's easiest if this patch just removes that conditional >> > > compilation from struct omap_mcbsp_platform_data as it really doesn't >> > > save that much from non !OMAP3 builds. >> > >> > Thanks. Will fix it in the next version. >> >> Any news on updating this series? >> >> Note that you can now leave out the omap4 hwmod data as that has >> been merged to omap-for-linus. >> > My impression from last round was that there is not that many changes > required. Of course there must not have bisect issues like above, should > not break OMAP1 (which I think was addressed already) but otherwise I > think most of the issues were small. > > Kevin had concerns about PM testing but I would not put that much > emphasis on that since the set should not make things any worse but > should make possible to go forward with PM. > > -- > Jarkko > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
