Hi Felipe,
On Monday 14 February 2011 14:41:16 Felipe Balbi wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 02:19:24PM +0100, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Monday 14 February 2011 13:35:59 Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > > On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 01:21:31PM +0100, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c
> > > > b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c index 4cf48ea..5d844bd 100644
> > > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c
> > > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c
> > > > @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@
> > > >
> > > > #if defined(CONFIG_VIDEO_OMAP2) ||
> > > > defined(CONFIG_VIDEO_OMAP2_MODULE)
> > > >
> > > > -static struct resource cam_resources[] = {
> > > > +static struct resource omap2cam_resources[] = {
> > >
> > > should this be __initdata ??
> >
> > The resources will be used when the OMAP3 ISP module is loaded. Won't
> > they be discared if marked as __initdata ?
>
> I believe driver core makes a copy of those, no ? not sure.
Not that I know of, but I may be wrong.
> > > > @@ -158,6 +149,14 @@ int omap3_init_camera(void *pdata)
> > > >
> > > > }
> > > > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(omap3_init_camera);
> > > >
> > > > +static inline void omap_init_camera(void)
> > >
> > > why inline ? also, should this be marked __init ?
> >
> > I suppose because it was inline, so it has been kept as inline. The
> > function is used in a single place, so the compiler will probably
> > auto-inline it. Is it an issue to keep it as inline ?
>
> not really, you can forget about this comment ;-)
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
