> -----Original Message----- > From: Paul Walmsley [mailto:paul@xxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2011 9:11 AM > To: Rajendra Nayak > Cc: Santosh Shilimkar; linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Kevin Hilman; Benoit Cousson; linux-arm- > kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 6/9] omap: dpll: Add allow_idle/deny_idle support for all DPLL's > > On Tue, 8 Feb 2011, Rajendra Nayak wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Paul Walmsley [mailto:paul@xxxxxxxxx] > > > Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2011 8:27 AM > > > > > > > arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock.c | 8 +++++++- > > > > arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock.h | 1 + > > > > arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock3xxx_data.c | 2 +- > > > > arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock44xx_data.c | 2 +- > > > > arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm44xx.c | 4 ++++ > > > > > > Looks like you add the allow_idle/deny_idle functions for the OMAP3 CORE > > > DPLL, but you don't change mach-omap2/pm34xx.c. Any reason for this? > > > > Nothing specifically. My initial patchset was enabling these only for > > OMAP4, So I thought will keep it that way. > > That's fine with me, but you might want to drop the OMAP3 part of the > changes, or put them into a separate patch. Ok, will add a separate patch for OMAP3 and remove the register writes from mach-omap2/pm34xx.c. > > Also, when you resend the autoidle patches, could you put them into a > separate series? There's an autoidle series that I've been working on > here, and I will add those into that series, and keep the other patch > series separate. Ok, will repost these patches as a separate series. Regards, Rajendra > > > thanks, > > - Paul -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
