> -----Original Message----- > From: Paul Walmsley [mailto:paul@xxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2011 10:23 PM > To: Rajendra Nayak > Cc: linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: RE: [PATCH] OMAP: hwmod: Do not expect an entry in clkdev to add alias for opt_clks > > On Tue, 1 Feb 2011, Rajendra Nayak wrote: > > > One other thing I was thinking of is if the function name > > _add_optional_clock_alias need to be changed to something like > > _add_optional_clock_clkdev since we are adding a new clkdev entry, > > if it does not exist, and no longer adding an 'alias' for an existing > > entry. > > Fine with me. > > > Also, the adding of an entry in clkdev is today done for > > optional clocks alone. Is there any reason why we should not do > > this at runtime for all main clks and interface clks also. > > That way we get rid of all dependencies with the static clkdev > > table, and we might infact not need one if all entries are added > > runtime. > > Heh, you've just uncovered my "secret" plan. It seemed best to me to wait > until all of the hwmod conversions were done to avoid alarming certain > people who might be consulting the static clkdev table in > mach-omap2/clock*_data.c as a platform reference... Ok, sounds good to me, thanks. Will repost this one with the mentioned changes. > > > - Paul -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
