Re: [PATCH 1/6] omap4: powerdomain: Add supported INACTIVE power state

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello Santosh,

On Fri, 28 Jan 2011, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:

> On OMAP4, one can explicitly program INACTIVE as the power state of
> the logic area inside the power domain. Techincally PD state programmed
> to ON and if all the clock domains within the PD are idled, is equivalent
> tp PD programmed to INACTIVE and all the clock domains within the PD are
> idled. There won't be any power difference in above two.
> 
> Since the CPUIDLE C-states explicitly make use of INACTIVE as a PD
> targeted state and also there is some additional latancy involved
> with PD INACTIVE vs PD ON, it's better to support it as an explcit
> PD state.
> 
> This patch adds the support to allow explicit PD INACTIVE
> programming if supported.

What does the hardware do when the powerdomain is programmed to INACTIVE?  
Does it actually force the clockdomains idle?


- Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux