Ricardo Salveti de Araujo <ricardo.salveti@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > In case in user has a OMAP3630 < ES1.2 the kernel should warn the user > about the ERRATUM, but using printk instead of WARN_ON is already > enough, as there is nothing else the user can do besides changing the > board. I agree, it doesn't need a full backtrace. Minor comment below... > Signed-off-by: Ricar do Salveti de Araujo <ricardo.salveti@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle34xx.c | 2 +- > arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c | 2 +- > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle34xx.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle34xx.c > index f7b22a1..abb9be0 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle34xx.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle34xx.c > @@ -464,7 +464,7 @@ void omap_init_power_states(void) > if (IS_PM34XX_ERRATUM(PM_SDRC_WAKEUP_ERRATUM_i583)) { > omap3_power_states[OMAP3_STATE_C7].valid = 0; > cpuidle_params_table[OMAP3_STATE_C7].valid = 0; > - WARN_ONCE(1, "%s: core off state C7 disabled due to i583\n", > + printk(KERN_WARNING "%s: core off state C7 disabled due to i583\n", > __func__); Please use pr_warn() instead. > } > } > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c > index a4aa192..983b543 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c > @@ -927,7 +927,7 @@ void omap3_pm_off_mode_enable(int enable) > pwrst->pwrdm == core_pwrdm && > state == PWRDM_POWER_OFF) { > pwrst->next_state = PWRDM_POWER_RET; > - WARN_ONCE(1, > + printk(KERN_WARNING > "%s: Core OFF disabled due to errata i583\n", > __func__); ditto > } else { Thanks, Kevin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html