> -----Original Message----- > From: Jean Pihet [mailto:jean.pihet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2011 3:20 PM > To: Santosh Shilimkar > Cc: Thomas Renninger; linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Jean Pihet-XID > Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf: add OMAP support for the new power events > [...] > > We need to track the actual power domain transitions as well > > at hardware level. > Agree > > > Can you please look at "pwrdm_pre_transition()" and > > "pwrdm_post_transition()" > > This code keep track of it using the next power state > > and prev-power state. > The current API only has 'trace_power_domain_target' which tracks > the > desired target state. > I think we need an extra tracer 'trace_power_domain_hitstate' so > that > the trace parser can compare the desired ('target') and actually hit > ('hitstate') states. > We use next state and previous state. 'hitstate' doesn't sound well that's really secondary. Do you plan to add that additional trace then ? Regards, Santosh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
