On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 2:08 PM, Poddar, Sourav <sourav.poddar@xxxxxx> wrote: > On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 3:05 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux > <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 11:44:59PM -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote: >>> At least another person did post results: >>> >>> http://mid.gmane.org/20110117094602.GA2622@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> http://mid.gmane.org/20110117110308.GC2622@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> >> Slightly different patch - there were three revisions. I can't attach >> a tested-by given to a different patch to this one. >> >>> > That means omap2plus_defconfig .38 mainline kernels >>> > (including -stable) will remain potentially dangerous when run on >>> > SMP capable hardware. >>> >>> I must admit that this series looks a bit large for stable IMHO. I >>> think that the fix for stable should limit itself only to prevent SMP >>> from being selected if anything else than CPU_32v6K is selected. >> >> The first three are the bare minimum required for -stable. >> > Boot tested the 14 patch series with CONFIG_SWP_EMULATE enabled, on the following boards : 1. Omap2420 SDP 2. Omap2430 SDP 3. Omap3430 SDP 4. Omap4 Blaze Tested-by: Sourav Poddar <sourav.poddar@xxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
