Balbi, > -----Original Message----- > From: Felipe Balbi [mailto:balbi@xxxxxx] > Sent: Saturday, January 22, 2011 10:48 PM > To: Vishwanath BS > Cc: linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; patches@xxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/13] OMAP: Basic DVFS Framework > > Hi, > > On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 07:30:52PM +0530, Vishwanath BS wrote: > > This patch series introduces support for Dynamic Voltage and > Frequency Scaling > > (DVFS) for OMAP devices. > > > > For detailed design details, refer to DVFS Documentation. > > If this is supposed to be used by drivers I would rather not as it's yet > another OMAP-specific API to use. > > Before you reply with "you can pass function pointers via platform_data" > let me say that even that is a burden, specially on devices which are > used by several archs. > > Why don't you make it more generic like the OPP layer was created ? > Isn't it better to just build on top of the OPP layer and make this one > also generic ? I do not think DVFS layer can be made a generic layer outside OMAP because of the fact that DVFS is closely coupled with OMAP device layer (for getting hwmod related data and clock handling), OMAP voltage layer (for voltage scaling and handling of dependency voltage domains) and smart reflex layer. Vishwa > > -- > balbi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
