On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 01:14:21PM +0530, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: > Surely whichever way we should remove the recalibration otherwise > every time secondary cpus spend ~ 200 ms there. > > Russell, > How do you like to address this? Well, the last piece of the puzzle which needs consideration is that omitting the calibration means that it produces user-visible /proc/cpuinfo changes. I can't say what effect that has. So, I think we need to do something about that to ensure that userspace won't be impacted should they be using the information in there. Maybe we need to initialize the secondary CPU bogomips values accordingly? Maybe zero is acceptable to mark that the calculation hasn't been done? Dunno. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
