* Jean Pihet <jean.pihet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [110119 13:36]: > Hi Tony, > > On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 8:10 PM, Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > * Jean Pihet <jean.pihet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [110119 00:05]: > >> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 12:44 AM, Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > * Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [110118 15:41]: > >> >> On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 01:05:49PM +0100, Jean Pihet wrote: > >> >> > Dave, Russell, > >> >> > > >> >> > On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 4:46 PM, Dave Martin <dave.martin@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> >> > > One way to work around this is would be to make omap_sram_push() a macro: > >> >> > > > >> >> > > #define omap_sram_push(funcp, size) \ > >> >> > > Â Â(typeof(funcp))_do_omap_sram_push((void *)(funcp), size) > >> >> > > > >> >> > > ... where the definition of _do_omap_sram_push() is the same is the > >> >> > > existing definition of omap_sram_push(). ÂProviding > >> >> > > _do_omap_sram_push() is not called directly, this should now be > >> >> > > type-safe. > >> >> > > > >> >> > Ok I reworked the patch from your suggestions. Indeed a few functions > >> >> > types mismatch have been spotted and corrected using the fncpy API. > >> >> > > >> >> > New patch sent as '[PATCH v2] OMAP: use fncpy to copy the PM code > >> >> > functions to SRAM'. > >> >> > >> >> Looks good, thanks. ÂNext problem to sort out is who's taking the > >> >> patches... > >> > > >> > You can take them but we should have at least Kevin test and ack them. > >> Sure, this needs some testing on OMAP1 & 2 platforms. It has only been > >> compile tested on those (means: compile OK, functions types mismatches > >> fixed). > >> > >> Anyone with OMAP1 & 2 boards willing to test? > > > > Can you please repost the whole set one more time or have them in > > some git branch? That way I can pull them into linux-omap master > > branch for testing to make sure omap1 and 2 boards don't break. > There is only patch to apply: '[PATCH v2] OMAP: use fncpy to copy the > PM code functions to SRAM' > (http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=129535214414192&w=2) which depends > on Dave Martin's ([PATCH v4] ARM: Thumb-2: Symbol manipulation macros > for function body copying' > (http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=129503990527072&w=2). > > Is this enough? If not I can have them in a branch of a gitorious tree. OK, will apply them into omap-testing. Then hopefully within next few days Russell can set up some immutable branch that we can merge too as some PM patches may conflict with these. Regards, Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
