Hi, On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 11:14:00AM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote: > I think there's been some patches related to this to get rid > of NR_IRQS? Might be worth taking a look at those first as it's > a generic solution. Yeah, one way would be to use Sparse IRQ numbering scheme and define different bases for different IRQ chips. We could use for example, something like: IRQ | Chip ===================== 0-299 | INTC 300-499 | TWL4030 500-599 | MENELAUS 600-799 | RETU 800-999 | TAHVO and so on. But I'm not sure that's good enough (numbers are just from the top of my head, didn't really check how many IRQs each one have). The only problem I see is with INTC, what happens if we give it an interval which ends up not being big enough for next OMAP versions ? -- balbi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
