ISTR that while JFFS2 worked with NAND, it had to reserve a few bytes of OOB data that might more naturally be used for ECC data. I've not looked at your layout ... does it reserve those bytes for use by JFFS, or is it using them for ECC? Also, ISTR that Some People felt that using JFFS2 with NAND was sub-optimal. Which is why we have other NAND filesystem choices, like UBI/UBIFS, and (currently out-of-tree) YAFFS2. - Dave -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
