Op 20 dec 2010, om 08:34 heeft Ming Lei het volgende geschreven: > Hi, > > 2010/12/20 Abraham Arce <abraham.arce.moreno@xxxxxxxxx>: >> Hi, >> >> On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 9:04 PM, Ming Lei <tom.leiming@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> In fact, the transition is not friendly indeed for a user. I don't know why >>> the transition is introduced, for what purpose? Who can give a explanation? >>> >> >> Patch itself has one explanation, kernel commit is >> b612633b5928077441b979471869753bfa93d41a >> >> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-serial/msg02788.html > > The commit does not explain the cause of renaming ttyS to ttyO, does it? It does, ttyS* is reserved for 8250, nearly all ARM platforms have their own name (ttySAC, ttySA, etc). I'm surprised omap got away with this for so long. I'm not saying the change is a pain, I'm just saying I went through this years ago for strongarm. regards, Koen-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
