* Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@xxxxxxxxxx> [101216 13:34]: > On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 11:08 PM, Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > I've seen a lot of discussion about this, are all of the review comments > >> > now addressed? > >> > >> Yes, all comments were addressed in this v3 iteration, and this thread > >> has been idle for about 10 days. > > > > That's because we are all busy with other things :( > > Oh sure, my intention was only positive (to demonstrate that there are > no outstanding comments), sorry if it sounded differently than > intended. > > > Sorry, I really don't have the time at the moment to review this code, > > nor does it seem to affect areas that I maintain, so I don't understand > > what you are looking for from me. > > Sorry for the noise - I contacted you because you maintain the driver > core, in the hope you could suggest where this can go through. > > Tony, Andrew, can you please have a look ? > > Any comment or suggestion is appreciated. Looks sane to me from omap point of view and it seems the locks are now all timeout based: Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> Regards, Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
