On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 2:49 PM, Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 6:45 PM, Laurent Pinchart > <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 4:15 > PM, Ionut Nicu <ionut.nicu@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> > I noticed this too, but this patch should fix it: >>> > >>> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/365292/ >>> >>> True. And in this patch the move to spin_lock_bh() is justifiable, >>> too, since it adds a sending path which is parallel to the mailbox >>> tasklet. >> >> Is this patch set ready for inclusion in the mainline kernel, or does it need >> to be reworked ? > > Better let Hari answer this one. > Yes, it is set to go into mainline kernel. Thank you, Best regards, Hari Kanigeri -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
