Vishwanath Sripathy <vishwanath.bs@xxxxxx> writes:
> Kevin,
[...]
>> @@ -288,20 +290,19 @@ unsigned long omap_pm_cpu_get_freq(void)
>>
>> int omap_pm_get_dev_context_loss_count(struct device *dev)
>> {
>> + struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev);
>> + int count;
>> +
>> if (!dev) {
>> WARN_ON(1);
>> return -EINVAL;
>> };
>>
>> - pr_debug("OMAP PM: returning context loss count for dev %s\n",
>> - dev_name(dev));
>> + count = omap_device_get_context_loss_count(pdev);
>> + pr_debug("OMAP PM: context loss count for dev %s = %d\n",
>> + dev_name(dev), count);
>
> Shouldn't this implementation be part of omap-pm.c where all the OMAP PM
> functions are to be implemented?
Where is omap-pm.c?
Kevin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
