>>-----Original Message----- >>From: Menon, Nishanth >>Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2010 10:51 PM >>To: Gopinath, Thara >>Cc: linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; paul@xxxxxxxxx; khilman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; >>Cousson, Benoit; Sripathy, Vishwanath; Sawant, Anand >>Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/9] OMAP3: Adding Smartreflex and Voltage driver >>support >> >>Gopinath, Thara had written, on 10/27/2010 11:10 AM, the following: >>> This patch series introduces smartreflex and voltage driver support >>> for OMAP3430 and OMAP3630. SmartReflex modules do adaptive voltage >>> control for real-time voltage adjustments. >>[..] >>thanks for the revamped set You are most welcome!! >>> >>> This patch series is based against lo-master with the following additional >>> patches applied. >>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/266911/ >>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/266921/ >>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/266931/ >>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/183712/ >>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/285872/ >>> >>> The entire series with the dependencies are available at >>> http://dev.omapzoom.org/?p=thara/omap-dvfs.git;a=summary >>> head: thara-pm-sr >>> >>> This patch series has been tested on OMAP3430 SDP with omap2plus_defconfig >>> with the following menuconfig options enabled. >>> System type -> TI OMAP Implementations -> Smartreflex Support >>> System type -> TI OMAP Implementations -> >>> Class 3 mode of Smartreflex Implementation >>> >>Thanks for hosting the branch, Looking at: Again glad tat u liked it:-) >>http://dev.omapzoom.org/?p=thara/omap-dvfs.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/thara- >>pm-sr >>I am guessing DVFS is missing in this branch? Is it possible to give it >>a test drive? Yes.. This is exactly what I am trying to do. Will keep you updated. >> >>Also curious should: >>"OMAP: OPP: twl/tps: Introduce TWL/TPS-specific code should probably be >>" dropped with "OMAP3: PM: Register TWL4030 pmic info with the voltage" ? Hmm.. Last time I suggested moving the contents of this patch to twl-core.c Nobody seemed to much keen. Hence I retained the plat-omap/opp-twl-tpl.c file. In fact "OMAP3: PM: Register TWL4030 pmic info with the voltage" registers the params from plat-omap/opp-twl-tpl.c. But if we have a consensus I will just drop this patch and have the pmic params passed from twl-core.c. >> >>[...] >> >>my 2cents: If that tree were organized based on branches which depend on >>each other it will be easier to identify the dependencies :) >>probably: >>kernel.org (now that l-o is merged - potential 2.6.37-rc1) >> |- clock patches -\ >> |- DVFS series -| >> |- OMAP OPP series | >> |-merged-based - >> |-voltage layer & SR series perhaps >> |- twl optimization >> |- board changes >> *** final code *** >>Just 2 cents to make it easier for folks who are not in PM mostly to see >>how everything falls together in place.. I agree. But then I need some five patches on top of potential 2.6.37-rc1, which are not present in any branch. Are you asking me to generate separate branches for all these patches? Regards Thara -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
