Hi, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > On Thu, 2010-10-07 at 09:37 +0200, ext Taneja, Archit wrote: >> Hi, > >>> I only now noticed that you had changed the feature list to a bit array. >>> It was an array of ints previously. Are you sure 32 features is enough? It >>> sounds a bit small to me. >>> >>> Tomi >> >> I was reworking our omap4 tree with the dss_features patch and was >> able to reach to 11 features. 32 may be probably enough till omap4, >> but yeah you are right, we will cross >> 32 at some point in time. I didn't like the array way before, any idea >> how we can extend the bit array method for more than 32 features? > > Do you mean 32 will probably be enough for omap2,3 and 4? If > so, I think we can go forward with this. It is a > dss_features.c internal detail, and can be changed easily in > the future to accomodate more features. > > Tomi Yes, a rough count results in around 25-26 features till omap4. I think we can go ahead with the bit array for now. Regards, Archit-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
