Vishwa, On Wed, 22 Sep 2010, Sripathy, Vishwanath wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Paul Walmsley [mailto:paul@xxxxxxxxx] > > Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 6:37 AM > > To: Sripathy, Vishwanath > > Cc: Reddy, Teerth; linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Subject: RE: [PATCHV4] OMAP3: SDRC : Errata 1.176 Fix - Accesses to DDR stall in > > SDRC after a Warm-reset > > > > Hello Vishwa, > > > > Thanks for the info. > > > > a few quick questions: > > > > On Thu, 16 Sep 2010, Sripathy, Vishwanath wrote: > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Paul Walmsley [mailto:paul@xxxxxxxxx] > > > > Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 3:05 AM > > > > > > > > On Tue, 25 May 2010, Reddy, Teerth wrote: > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > From: Paul Walmsley [mailto:paul@xxxxxxxxx] > > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2010 6:03 AM > > > > > > To: Reddy, Teerth > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, 23 Apr 2010, Reddy, Teerth wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > From: Teerth Reddy <teerth@xxxxxx> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This patch has the workaround for errata 1.176. > > > > > > > > What's the current status of this patch? Still waiting for an updated > > > > version. > > > > > > We have realized that this errata is not applicable if reset is > > > triggered via dpll3 reset. The rootcasuse of the issues was that incase > > > of warm reset, SDRC is not sensitive to the warm reset, but the > > > interconect is reset on the fly, thus causing a misalignment between > > > SDRC logic, interconect logic and DDR memory state. Hence the workaround > > > was proposed. However, incase of dpll3 reset, sdrc also gets reset. In > > > omap_prcm_arch_reset, system reset is triggered via dpll3 reset, so this > > > WA is not applicable. > > > > > > 1. So by "warm reset," are you referring to the software warm reset > > triggered by GLOBAL_SW_RST, or by another mechanism? > > Yes, warm reset by means of GLOBAL_SW_RST. > > > 2. If GLOBAL_SW_RST, what do you think about adding a brief comment in the > > code warning people not to use GLOBAL_SW_RST unless they implement the > > Errata 1.176 sequence? > Yes, a note can be added. I will send a patch with this comment. Any progress on this? - Paul -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
