> -----Original Message----- > From: Menon, Nishanth > Sent: Friday, October 01, 2010 3:13 PM > To: G, Manjunath Kondaiah > Cc: Peter Ujfalusi; Tony Lindgren; > linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Jarkko Nikula; Liam Girdwood > Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] OMAP3: DMA: Errata: sDMA FIFO > draining does not finish > > G, Manjunath Kondaiah had written, on 10/01/2010 04:29 AM, > the following: > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: linux-omap-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> [mailto:linux-omap-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of > Peter Ujfalusi > >> Sent: Friday, October 01, 2010 2:22 PM > >> To: Menon, Nishanth > >> Cc: Tony Lindgren; linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Jarkko Nikula; Liam > >> Girdwood > >> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] OMAP3: DMA: Errata: sDMA FIFO > draining does > >> not finish > > ... > > > >>>> + if (cpu_is_omap34xx() && (l & > OMAP_DMA_CCR_SEL_SRC_DST_SYNC)) { > >>> does it make sense to use an dma_errata variable and populate it? > >> Hmmm, the errata handling via dma_errata shall be done separately > >> IMHO, since if we do that, than we need to revisit other > parts of the > >> code as well, and replace the existing errata handling. > >> > >> But yes, it would make the code much more readable, and we > can easily > >> track, which errata has been already addressed. > >> > > > > This is already done as a part of dma hwmod which is under review. > > > > -Manjunath > Apologies, but does that mean: > a) the errata i541 is handled as well as part of hwmod series? No. > b) the patch needs to be ported ontop of hwmod series? Yes. -Manjunath-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
