Re: [PATCH] mfd: speedup twl4030 irq response time and decrease irq disable time

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 01:01:32PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> 2010/9/28 Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

> > Have you raised this issue with the genirq guys?  This sounds like
> > something that the core infrastructure should be able to cope with.

> Even genirq guys can help us to convert to irq thread framework, I
> don't think there is good way to set priority for one irq thread.

What I'm saying is that this sounds like something it's reasonable to
want to do so if there's no way currently to get high priority handling
of timing sensitive interrupt controllers it'd be good if there could
be.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux