Re: [PATCH 1/2] OMAP: features: export symbol omap3_features

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Paul Walmsley had written, on 09/24/2010 10:34 AM, the following:
[...]
u32 omap3_features;
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(omap3_features);
unsigned int omap_rev(void)
 {
--
1.7.1


This omap3_features variable should not be used directly by any device drivers since it is an OMAP-ism. This type of feature info should be passed through struct platform_data. Looks like this would be quite easy to add by editing mach-omap2/devices.c and adding platform_data?

...

In the medium-term, definitely all of those
    #if defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP*)

and
    if (cpu_is_omap*()) {

in this driver need to be removed. The integration code (currently in mach-omap2/devices.c) is what should handle this, or better yet, struct dev_attr from hwmod.

Also the entire mailboxes driver at some point should be moved into drivers/* ...
just my 2 cents:

The intent of omap_has_featureX() is to ensure that the drivers dont do cpu_is_omap123(). Now if we had OMAP dma driver which has DMA chaining - what options do we have DMA driver?

a) we introduce it based on cpu_is_omap123() -> bad bad nightmare for maintenance b) we introduce it based on module h/w block(TI internal terminology "IP block") revision -> unfortunately no luck in some of the h/w blocks.
c) we use if (omap_has_dma_chaining())

If the hwmod itself was expanded to contain feature, and erratas then it is excellent solution - one stop information source for all drivers and a standardized soln as well.. (but we dont have it on omap1).

by not exporting this, the drivers are restricted to being static, and exporting allows those omap specific ones to be loadable (if someone really wants so minimalist a system - i believe i2c is an example of loadable module)..

I believe omap_has_feature() is a readable and maintainable way of handling features and exporting helps those drivers to become modules (yes with the risk of some other driver misusing it as well) - this definitely is something we've been doing for some time in l-o I guess.. a better alternative might be hwmod - but I am no expert to comment on it's feasibility..

--
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux