Ramirez Luna, Omar wrote: > Fix the mailbox support detection for OMAP3630, 3530/25 and 2430. > > Signed-off-by: Omar Ramirez Luna <omar.ramirez@xxxxxx> > --- > - Testing was made under 3630 and 3430 boards. > - Given that 2430 uses similar initialization than OMAP3, changes > to handle this case was added to the patch. > - HWMOD adaptation hopefully should solve this mess, but as of now > mailbox should work as before at least. > > arch/arm/mach-omap2/mailbox.c | 12 ++++++++---- > 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/mailbox.c > b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/mailbox.c index 42dbfa4..26d6fb0 100644 --- > a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/mailbox.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/mailbox.c > @@ -394,15 +394,19 @@ static int __devinit omap2_mbox_probe(struct > platform_device *pdev) > > if (false) > ; > -#if defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP3430) > - else if (cpu_is_omap3430()) { > +#if defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP3) > + else if (omap3_has_iva()) { Hmm, seems omap3_has_ ##feat are only available for built-in and not module configurations, this patch is not so good after all since it throws: ERROR: "omap3_features" [arch/arm/mach-omap2/mailbox_mach.ko] undefined! Regards, Omar -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html