Hi Tony,
On 8/6/2010 2:47 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Alexander Shishkin<virtuoso@xxxxxxxxx> [100806 15:30]:
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 08:05:20 +0300, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
This adds a sysfs file at /sys/power/coresight_save which is used to
control if the ETM and debug components' states should be saved and
restored across OFF modes.
The non-omap patches are merged to Russell's tree, so these three are
the only remaining.
This one won't apply to linux-omap master any more because of the pm44xx
in the makefile, but should be ok otherwise. It would still apply to
linus' tree.
So, should I rediff it, resend it or just drop it, because it's not needed?
Patches look OK to me.
These patches are still using static virtual to physical mapping in
io.h, shouldn't we take the opportunity of this series to fix that and
use ioremap instead?
Or do you prefer to do that in a second step?
Regards,
Benoit
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
