Hi,
* Roger Quadros <roger.quadros@xxxxxxxxx> [100819 17:17]:
> On 08/19/2010 04:09 PM, Krogerus Heikki (EXT-Teleca/Helsinki) wrote:
> >On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 02:40:42PM +0200, ext Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> >>On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 03:09:37PM +0300, Krogerus Heikki (EXT-Teleca/Helsinki) wrote:
> >>>@@ -909,5 +913,6 @@ void __init rx51_peripherals_init(void)
> >>> spi_register_board_info(rx51_peripherals_spi_board_info,
> >>> ARRAY_SIZE(rx51_peripherals_spi_board_info));
> >>> omap2_hsmmc_init(mmc);
> >>>+ platform_device_register(&rx51_charger_device);
> >>
> >>Maybe
> >>
> >> platform_device_register_simple("isp1704_charger", -1, NULL, 0);
> >
> >I guess it's enough in this case. Ameya, Roger, any objections?
> >
> I'm fine with the current approach. No need to re-spin.
Just checking.. Anton, can you please queue up this 2/2 patch too to
keep them together? Here's my ack:
Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
