On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 12:59 AM, Kevin Hilman <khilman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Govindraj <govindraj.ti@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 5:32 PM, Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> * Govindraj <govindraj.ti@xxxxxxxxx> [100608 09:24]: >>>> On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 9:45 PM, Luke-Jr <luke@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> > On Monday 07 June 2010 08:28:51 am Govindraj wrote: >>>> >> Link: >>>> >> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/khilman/linux-omap-pm.git;a=summa >>>> >> ry >>>> >> >>>> >> Branch: >>>> >> pm-wip/uart >>>> > >>>> > This branch doesn't appear to have omap-serial.c at all... >>>> > >>>> >> If you are trying to use with any client device connected to uart >>>> >> then we need to ensure the client driver speaks to omap-serial >>>> >> dev entries. >>>> > >>>> >>>> You need apply the driver patch on top of this branch. >>>> >>>> [PATCH v3] serial: Add OMAP high-speed UART driver. >>> >>> Do we still have a dependency to pm-wip/uart branch? Can you please >>> check if you can rebase all these patches on top of linux-omap for-next >>> branch? >> >> pm-wip uart branch is having all the mach-omap2/serail.c changes along with >> hwmod data file updation and serial hwmod usage. >> >> The driver patch [serial: Add OMAP high-speed UART driver] >> was tested against wip/uart branch. >> >> I will re-base all these patches for-next branch, >> and will post driver and board support patches from pm-wip/uart as a >> single series. > > Any update on this? > > FWIW, I rebased the pm-wip/uart part on top of latest > pm-wip/hwmods-omap4 but from here, you should take over responsibility > for pm-wip/uart. > Yes sure, Will test and post to LO from pm-wip/uart. Thanks, Govindraj.R > Kevin > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
