Govindraj <govindraj.ti@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 5:32 PM, Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> * Govindraj <govindraj.ti@xxxxxxxxx> [100608 09:24]: >>> On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 9:45 PM, Luke-Jr <luke@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> > On Monday 07 June 2010 08:28:51 am Govindraj wrote: >>> >> Link: >>> >> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/khilman/linux-omap-pm.git;a=summa >>> >> ry >>> >> >>> >> Branch: >>> >> pm-wip/uart >>> > >>> > This branch doesn't appear to have omap-serial.c at all... >>> > >>> >> If you are trying to use with any client device connected to uart >>> >> then we need to ensure the client driver speaks to omap-serial >>> >> dev entries. >>> > >>> >>> You need apply the driver patch on top of this branch. >>> >>> [PATCH v3] serial: Add OMAP high-speed UART driver. >> >> Do we still have a dependency to pm-wip/uart branch? Can you please >> check if you can rebase all these patches on top of linux-omap for-next >> branch? > > pm-wip uart branch is having all the mach-omap2/serail.c changes along with > hwmod data file updation and serial hwmod usage. > > The driver patch [serial: Add OMAP high-speed UART driver] > was tested against wip/uart branch. > > I will re-base all these patches for-next branch, > and will post driver and board support patches from pm-wip/uart as a > single series. Any update on this? FWIW, I rebased the pm-wip/uart part on top of latest pm-wip/hwmods-omap4 but from here, you should take over responsibility for pm-wip/uart. Kevin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
