RE: [PATCH] omap4: fb: Adds missing display update call when panning

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Shilimkar, Santosh
> Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2010 6:19 PM
> To: Janorkar, Mayuresh; tomi.valkeinen@xxxxxxxxx
> Cc: linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Diaz Prado, Gustavo
> Subject: RE: [PATCH] omap4: fb: Adds missing display update call when
> panning
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: linux-omap-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:linux-omap-
> > owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Janorkar, Mayuresh
> > Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2010 6:07 PM
> > To: tomi.valkeinen@xxxxxxxxx
> > Cc: linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Diaz Prado, Gustavo; Janorkar, Mayuresh
> > Subject: [PATCH] omap4: fb: Adds missing display update call when
> panning
> >
> > From: Gustavo Diaz Prado <x0083741@xxxxxx>
> >
> > Adds the missing display update call when panning, this
> > is needed for the DSI panel when the auto-update feature is
> > not enabled.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Gustavo Diaz Prado <x0083741@xxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Mayuresh Janorkar <mayur@xxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  drivers/video/omap2/omapfb/omapfb-main.c |    8 +++++++-
> >  1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/video/omap2/omapfb/omapfb-main.c
> > b/drivers/video/omap2/omapfb/omapfb-main.c
> > index 4abb1d1..12d5382 100644
> > --- a/drivers/video/omap2/omapfb/omapfb-main.c
> > +++ b/drivers/video/omap2/omapfb/omapfb-main.c
> > @@ -1068,7 +1068,8 @@ static int omapfb_pan_display(struct
> > fb_var_screeninfo *var,
> >  {
> >  	struct omapfb_info *ofbi = FB2OFB(fbi);
> >  	struct fb_var_screeninfo new_var;
> > -	int r;
> > +	int r = 0;
> > +	struct omap_dss_device *display = fb2display(fbi);
> >
> >  	DBG("pan_display(%d)\n", FB2OFB(fbi)->id);
> >
> > @@ -1086,6 +1087,11 @@ static int omapfb_pan_display(struct
> > fb_var_screeninfo *var,
> >
> >  	r = omapfb_apply_changes(fbi, 0);
> >
> > +	if (display && display->driver->update &&
> > +		display->driver->get_update_mode(display)
> > +			== OMAP_DSS_UPDATE_MANUAL)
> If the display dereference is checked, there is no need to check the base
> pointer (display), right ?
[Mayuresh]: That's correct. I would take it into account.
> > +		display->driver->update(display, 0, 0, var->xres, var->yres);
> > +
> >  	omapfb_put_mem_region(ofbi->region);
> >
> >  	return r;
> > --
> > 1.5.4.7
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Are there any more comments?
If not can I resend the patch incorporating Santosh's comments?

-Thanks,
Mayuresh

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux