On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 05:06:23PM +0200, ext Alan Stern wrote:
If people don't mind, here is a greatly simplified summary of the comments and objections I have seen so far on this thread: The in-kernel suspend blocker implementation is okay, even beneficial.
I disagree here. I believe expressing that as QoS is much better. Let the kernel decide which power state is better as long as I can say I need 100us IRQ latency or 100ms wakeup latency.
-- balbi DefectiveByDesign.org -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
