On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 2:14 PM, Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> Unfortunately I don't have a setup right now to test this, but the code >>> seems to be ok for our needs, don't you think ? >> >> But yeah, actually that fits our needs; calling the dma_map only, >> while still wrong, will give us the same behavior we have right now >> (v2.6.33). > > Great, so are you ok with this patchset proposal ? I thought you were going to add separate ioctls, one for dma_map, and another for dma_unmap that receive direction as an argument. Then, map the current PROC_FLUSH/INVALIDATE to those without changing their semantics, but marking them as deprecated. > I'll just add support for the VM_IO path you mentioned. Cool. I actually tried your patches to render to the framebuffer, and everything seemed to work fine. I didn't check for error codes or anything, so I'm not sure what's going on. -- Felipe Contreras -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html