On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 11:44 PM, Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > * Mike Rapoport <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [100422 01:41]: >> Ghorai, Sukumar wrote: >> >> CM-T35, for instance can be assembled with different NAND flash >> chips. Besides, boards that use NAND as primary boot device, we >> anyway depend on proper GPMC configuration in the bootloader chain. >> Having ability to define GPMC timings in the kernel and keep the >> settings made by the bootloader adds flexibility level for board >> designers. > > Not implementing the retime function for GPMC will cause issues > with PM as you cannot scale the L3 frequency without breaking > your GPMC timings. BTW, there is a patch from Stanley.Miao already in LO: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/93613/ But it is still advisable to implement the retime function as stated by Tony. -- Regards, Vimal Singh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
